Barcelona ended the season with results far from satisfactory. The Catalans camps promise to get up and tough as usual for the season ahead.
This season, Barca failed to maintain two important trophy they won last season, La Liga and Champions League. Los Cules was unable to stem Madrid in the league, while in their Champions League Chelsea ousted.
Nevertheless, there is still a trophy "entertainment" to be had Barca, the Copa del Rey. The requirement, they must first beat Athletic Bilbao in the final, 25 May.
"We have worked hard to prepare himself for the King's Cup final. We will try to win it," said Pedro Rodriguez, after the match Real Betis counter, Sunday (13/05/2012) pm dawn.
Next season, Barca will be trained by Pep Guardiola's assistant Tito Vilanova. Vilanova Together, they sure can pay for the failure of the season.
"This season is flying two important trophies. However, we will come back strong as it used to ta
Minggu, 13 Mei 2012
Barca Bertekad Bangkit Musim Depan
Barcelona mengakhiri musim ini dengan hasil yang jauh dari kata memuaskan. Kubu The Catalans berjanji akan bangkit dan setangguh biasanya pada musim depan.
Musim ini, Barca gagal mempertahankan dua trofi penting yang mereka raih pada musim lalu, La Liga dan Liga Champions. Los Cules tak kuasa membendung Madrid di liga, sementara di Liga Champions mereka dijungkalkan Chelsea.
Kendati demikian, masih ada satu trofi "hiburan" yang bisa didapat Barca, yakni Copa del Rey. Syaratnya, mereka harus lebih dulu mengalahkan Athletic Bilbao di final, 25 Mei mendatang.
"Kami telah bekerja keras untuk mempersiapkan diri demi final Piala Raja. Kami akan mencoba untuk memenanginya," sahut Pedro Rodriguez, seusai pertandingan kontra Real Betis, Minggu (13/5/2012) dinihari WIB.
Mulai musim depan, Barca akan dilatih oleh asisten Pep Guardiola, Tito Vilanova. Bersama Vilanova, mereka yakin bisa membayar kegagalan pada musim ini.
"Musim ini dua trofi penting melayang. Namun, kami akan kembali sekuat dulu pada tahun depan," ujar Victor Valdes.
Musim ini, Barca gagal mempertahankan dua trofi penting yang mereka raih pada musim lalu, La Liga dan Liga Champions. Los Cules tak kuasa membendung Madrid di liga, sementara di Liga Champions mereka dijungkalkan Chelsea.
Kendati demikian, masih ada satu trofi "hiburan" yang bisa didapat Barca, yakni Copa del Rey. Syaratnya, mereka harus lebih dulu mengalahkan Athletic Bilbao di final, 25 Mei mendatang.
"Kami telah bekerja keras untuk mempersiapkan diri demi final Piala Raja. Kami akan mencoba untuk memenanginya," sahut Pedro Rodriguez, seusai pertandingan kontra Real Betis, Minggu (13/5/2012) dinihari WIB.
Mulai musim depan, Barca akan dilatih oleh asisten Pep Guardiola, Tito Vilanova. Bersama Vilanova, mereka yakin bisa membayar kegagalan pada musim ini.
"Musim ini dua trofi penting melayang. Namun, kami akan kembali sekuat dulu pada tahun depan," ujar Victor Valdes.
Luis Carlos Almeida da Cunha "Nani MU"
Luís Carlos Almeida da Cunha (born 17 November 1986), commonly known as Nani, is a Portuguese footballer currently playing as a winger for English club Manchester United in the Premier League and the Portugal national team. Although predominantly right-footed, he has been utilised on the left-wing on many occasions.
Nani was born in Cape Verde and emigrated to Europe with his family at an early age. He was raised in Portugal and began his football career playing for local side Real Massamá. At the age of 16, he began training with Sporting Clube de Portugal and S.L. Benfica on alternate days, eventually joining Sporting's youth squad after they offered him pre-season training. In 2005, he made his professional debut with the club and won the Portuguese Cup during his second season with them. Nani was named the SJPF Young Player of the Month for May 2007 and his performances with Sporting culminated into a move to English club side Manchester United in July 2007 for a fee of €25.5 million. Nani won the Community Shield on his competitive debut at the club and has since added a number of trophies which included the Premier League and Champions League during his debut season at the club. He has established himself as first-choice winger at Manchester United and has won a further Premier League title, the Football League Cup, one FIFA Club World Cup, and three Community Shield titles. Individually, Nani has been included into the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) Premier League Team of the Year on one occasion and was a nominee for the PFA Young Player of the Year in 2011.
Nani is also a Portugal international. Prior to playing at senior level, he played at under-21 level. He made his senior international debut in September 2006 in a friendly match against Denmark and scored his first international goal during the 4–2 defeat in Copenhagen. Since his debut, he has made 52 appearances and scored 12 goals for Portugal.
Nani's older brother taught him how to play football and he played with his childhood friend, midfielder Manuel Fernandes Around the age of 14, Nani's older brother took him to train with Real MassamáThey were Nani's first club and gave him money, food, and helped him obtain an ID Card and a passport. At the age of 16, Nani was training on alternate days with Sporting and Benfica. Nani sometimes walked miles to and from practice before Sporting offered him pre-season training.Despite growing up in Lisbon, Nani and his brother supported Porto as a boy and his footballing hero was Luís Figo.
Nani joined Sporting CP from his first club Real Massamá
After two seasons in the youth team, where he won the National Junior
Championship in 2004–05, Nani was promoted to the first team early in
the 2005–06 seasonOn 10 August 2005, Nani made his Sporting debut, coming on as a substitute for Custódio in the 73rd minute in a 1–0 home defeat to Udinese in their third-round qualifier in the UEFA Champions League.[11][12] Nani made his Portuguese Liga debut on 28 August replacing Deivid in the 76th minute of a 2–1 victory over Marítimo at the Estádio dos Barreiros.Nani scored his first Sporting goal on 30 October, opening the scoring in a 2–2 draw away to BoavistaNani ended the first season of his career with 36 appearances and five goals in all competitions.
Nani first came into the spotlight after scoring in the Champions League against Spartak Moscow, netting Sporting's goal in a 1–1 group stage tie on 27 September 2006. Nani helped Sporting win the 2006–07 Portuguese Cup, lifting the trophy after a 1–0 win over Belenenses on 27 May 2007 in the final[18] Nani was then named as the SJPF Young Player of the Month for May 2007Nani's second season with Sporting ended with similar league statistics and 40 appearances and six goals in all competitions.
Nani with Gilberto Silva
Nani scored on his debut in a pre-season friendly against Shenzhen, netting the third in a 6–0 winHe also scored in the following game against Guangzhou Pharmaceutical with a chip off the right post from the left side of the penalty area in a 3–0 win.On 5 August 2007, Nani made his competitive debut for United, coming on as a substitute in the Community Shield against Chelsea. He marked his debut with a trophy after they won 3–0 on penalties, following a 1–1 draw during normal time.[This was followed up by Nani's third goal for the club three days later, when he scored against Glentoran in another 3–0 pre-season win.
Nani's Premier League debut came in United's opening match at home to Reading on 12 August as a substitute for Wayne Rooney, who had suffered a foot injuryTwo weeks later, on 26 August, Nani scored his first competitive goal for United, netting a 30-yard winner in the 69th minute against Tottenham Hotspur. Nani also set up crucial goals for Louis Saha and Nemanja Vidić allowing United to beat both Sunderland and Everton 1–0 He returned to his previous club, Sporting, in a Champions League tie in September, though it was team-mate and fellow former Sporting man Cristiano Ronaldo scored the winner in a 1–0 victory.Nani opened the scoring in a 4–1 home victory over Middlesbrough on 27 October.
Nani playing for United in 2008
On 16 February 2008, Nani put in a man of the match performance against Arsenal in the FA Cup
Fourth Round, his goal and two assists helping United to a 4–0 win over
their rivals. During the match, Nani was involved in an altercation
with Arsenal captain William Gallas who felt that the Portuguese was "showboating".After the match, Arsène Wenger was equally displeased, while Gilberto Silva said that Nani had a "big head". On 23 March, Nani set up the second and scored the final goal in a 3–0 victory over rivals Liverpool, in the 79th and 81st minutes respectively, after coming onto the pitch as a substitute. On 3 May, towards the end of a 4–1 win over West Ham United, Nani was sent off for the first time in his United career for a headbutt on West Ham defender Lucas Neill.On 21 May, Nani came on as a substitute for Wayne Rooney in the 2008 UEFA Champions League Final as United defeated Chelsea
6–5 on penalties following a 1–1 draw after extra time. Nani took and
scored Manchester United's crucial fifth penalty in the shootout.
Nani scored his first goal of the 2008–09 season on 23 September 2008, scoring United's third goal in a 3–1 win over Middlesbrough in the last minute to secure passage to the Fourth Round of the Carling Cup.On 18 October, he scored from a Wayne Rooney assist to complete the 4–0 rout of West Bromwich Albion at Old Trafford.[42] On 20 January 2009, he opened the scoring for United in their 4–2 win at home to Derby County in the second leg of their League Cup semi-final.
Following several poor performances, Nani criticised Sir Alex Ferguson for his lack of confidence in him.[49] Despite this outburst Nani was given a chance to shine and provided an assist for Rooney in the 4–0 league win over Hull City.[50] Soon after this positive display he put in another good performance in their League Cup semi-final victory over derby rivals Manchester City, revealing a heart-to-heart with Sir Alex Ferguson had resulted in a better display of form.[51] On 31 January 2010, Nani scored the first goal and set up Rooney's 100th career Premier League strike in a 3–1 league victory over Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium.[52] Nani's goal was first thought of as a Manuel Almunia own-goal by many sources, but was confirmed as belonging to Nani on 26 March by the Dubious Goals Panel.[53][54] Following this performance, Nani then set up the second of a 5–0 home win over Portsmouth.[55]
Just four days later, however, he was sent off for a lunge at Stiliyan Petrov against Aston Villa, which resulted in a three match ban and ruled him out of the League Cup final.[57] On 10 March, Nani set up Rooney's second in a 4–0 win over Milan,[58] before providing another assist for Rooney four days later in the 3–0 league victory over Fulham.[59]
On 26 March, Nani signed a new four-year contract with United, committing himself until 2014.[60] A day later, Nani took his assist tally in the league for the season to nine as he set up two goals in a 4–0 win over Bolton at the Reebok Stadium, providing goals for Dimitar Berbatov and Darron Gibson.[61] On 7 April, Nani scored his first ever European goals for United, netting two strikes in a 3–2 victory over Bayern Munich. Despite United winning the game, they were eliminated from the competition due to the away goals rule when the aggregate score was 4–4.[62] On 24 April, Nani scored his first league goal at Old Trafford for 18 months, netting United's second in a 3–1 home victory over Tottenham Hotspur.[63] On 2 May, Nani scored for the second game in a row, netting the only goal in a 1–0 away victory over SunderlandNani's third season with Manchester United ended with 34 appearances and seven goals in all competitions
Nani celebrates scoring against West Bromwich Albion in a 2–2 draw on 16 October 2010
On 22 August 2010, Nani missed a penalty in the 87th minute away to Fulham, and they then equalised two minutes later through Brede Hangeland to end the game 2–2.Six days later in a 3–0 home victory over West Ham United, Nani netted his first goal of the season and assisted Dimitar Berbatov in a Man of the Match display.[67] Nani scored and assisted Michael Owen in a 2–2 away draw away to Bolton Wanderers on 26 September.[68] On 16 October, Nani scored United's second in a 2–2 home draw against West Bromwich Albion.[69]
Four days later Nani scored his first Champions League goal of the
season, netting the solitary strike in a 1–0 home victory over BursasporNani scored a controversial second goal as United beat Tottenham Hotspur 2–0 at home on 30 October Nani scored into an empty net after Tottenham goalkeeper Heurelho Gomes
rolled the ball out to take a free-kick that he thought had been given
for handball, however, play was allowed to go on as referee Mark Clattenburg did not blow his whistle.On 27 November, Nani scored United's fifth goal in a 7–1 home win over Blackburn RoversNani netted his first goal of 2011 as he scored the winning strike in a 2–1 home victory over Stoke City on 4 January
On 22 January, Nani scored the final goal of a 5–0 home victory over Birmingham City Nani netted United's only goal in their first league loss of the season, a 2–1 defeat at Wolves on 5 February. Seven days later Nani scored his first Manchester derby goal, opening the scoring in a 2–1 home victory over Manchester City. On 6 March, during United's 3–1 loss against Liverpool at Anfield, Nani was injured following a challenge from Jamie Carragher just before half-time. Nani came to tears after the challenge and subsequently he was stretched off the pitch. Following post-match comments to the press from Manchester United it was believed Nani had suffered a broken leg. However this was not the case as he started training the following week.It was thought that Nani would miss up to three weeks as a result of this tackle and would return in April, however, he recovered in time to play 61 minutes of a 2–1 victory over Marseille on 15 MarchHe was revealed as a contender for the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) Young Player of the Year award alongside teammate Javier Hernández on 8 April.However, many people, including Nani, expressed their surprise that he was not nominated for the main awardFollowing this nomination, he assisted both goals in a 2–0 home win over Fulham on 9 April.] Nani lost out to Jack Wilshere for the PFA Young Player of the Year award on 18 April but he was however included into the PFA Premier League Team of the Year for the first timeHe was awarded for his outstanding season as he was voted Players' Player of the Year at the club's awards night on 18 May.
Nani in action for Portugal
Nani made his first appearance for the senior Portuguese team on 1 September 2006, and marked his debut with a goal in Portugal's 4–2 friendly defeat to DenmarkNani was omitted from Portugal's 1-1 draw with Armenia, but was recalled for Euro 2008 qualifiers against Poland and Serbia in September] He also provided the assist for Ricardo Quaresma's goal in a friendly against Italy on 6 February 2008Nani was ruled out of Portugal's friendly with Greece in March 2008 due to injury.
Nani scored twice and set up another again in a 5-3 win over Iceland on October 7, 2011.
Nani was born in Cape Verde and emigrated to Europe with his family at an early age. He was raised in Portugal and began his football career playing for local side Real Massamá. At the age of 16, he began training with Sporting Clube de Portugal and S.L. Benfica on alternate days, eventually joining Sporting's youth squad after they offered him pre-season training. In 2005, he made his professional debut with the club and won the Portuguese Cup during his second season with them. Nani was named the SJPF Young Player of the Month for May 2007 and his performances with Sporting culminated into a move to English club side Manchester United in July 2007 for a fee of €25.5 million. Nani won the Community Shield on his competitive debut at the club and has since added a number of trophies which included the Premier League and Champions League during his debut season at the club. He has established himself as first-choice winger at Manchester United and has won a further Premier League title, the Football League Cup, one FIFA Club World Cup, and three Community Shield titles. Individually, Nani has been included into the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) Premier League Team of the Year on one occasion and was a nominee for the PFA Young Player of the Year in 2011.
Nani is also a Portugal international. Prior to playing at senior level, he played at under-21 level. He made his senior international debut in September 2006 in a friendly match against Denmark and scored his first international goal during the 4–2 defeat in Copenhagen. Since his debut, he has made 52 appearances and scored 12 goals for Portugal.
Early life
Nani was born on 17 November 1986 in Praia, Cape Verde, off the west coast of AfricaNani emigrated with his family to Portugal at an early age. Nani was raised by his aunt Antonia in the Santa Filomena estate in the Amadora district of Lisbon after being abandoned by his parents. At the age of five, his father left for a holiday in Cape Verde but never returned and when he was 12 years old his mother left Portugal to start a new life in Holland.Nani has nine siblings from his mother, of which he is the youngest, and five from his father.[ Nani gained his nickname from an elder sister at a young age.Nani's older brother taught him how to play football and he played with his childhood friend, midfielder Manuel Fernandes Around the age of 14, Nani's older brother took him to train with Real MassamáThey were Nani's first club and gave him money, food, and helped him obtain an ID Card and a passport. At the age of 16, Nani was training on alternate days with Sporting and Benfica. Nani sometimes walked miles to and from practice before Sporting offered him pre-season training.Despite growing up in Lisbon, Nani and his brother supported Porto as a boy and his footballing hero was Luís Figo.
Sporting CP
Nani first came into the spotlight after scoring in the Champions League against Spartak Moscow, netting Sporting's goal in a 1–1 group stage tie on 27 September 2006. Nani helped Sporting win the 2006–07 Portuguese Cup, lifting the trophy after a 1–0 win over Belenenses on 27 May 2007 in the final[18] Nani was then named as the SJPF Young Player of the Month for May 2007Nani's second season with Sporting ended with similar league statistics and 40 appearances and six goals in all competitions.
Manchester United
Early years
Nani was sold to Manchester United F.C. for €25.5 million, five percent of which was paid to Real de Massamá.He passed his medical on 6 June 2007, and signed a five-year contract a month later, joining Portugal team-mate
Nani's Premier League debut came in United's opening match at home to Reading on 12 August as a substitute for Wayne Rooney, who had suffered a foot injuryTwo weeks later, on 26 August, Nani scored his first competitive goal for United, netting a 30-yard winner in the 69th minute against Tottenham Hotspur. Nani also set up crucial goals for Louis Saha and Nemanja Vidić allowing United to beat both Sunderland and Everton 1–0 He returned to his previous club, Sporting, in a Champions League tie in September, though it was team-mate and fellow former Sporting man Cristiano Ronaldo scored the winner in a 1–0 victory.Nani opened the scoring in a 4–1 home victory over Middlesbrough on 27 October.
Nani scored his first goal of the 2008–09 season on 23 September 2008, scoring United's third goal in a 3–1 win over Middlesbrough in the last minute to secure passage to the Fourth Round of the Carling Cup.On 18 October, he scored from a Wayne Rooney assist to complete the 4–0 rout of West Bromwich Albion at Old Trafford.[42] On 20 January 2009, he opened the scoring for United in their 4–2 win at home to Derby County in the second leg of their League Cup semi-final.
Breakthrough
After Cristiano Ronaldo's transfer to Real Madrid in the 2009 close season, the weight of expectation was on Nani to step up from bit part player and replace his fellow Portuguese. Nani's first contribution to United's new season was opening the scoring in the 10th minute of the 2009 FA Community Shield, but United eventually lost the match on penalties after a 2–2 draw. Nani suffered a dislocated shoulder during the match, which was originally expected to keep him out of the start of the season.[45] He recovered in time to play 17 minutes for Portugal against Liechtenstein on 12 August, however,[46] and started the match against Birmingham City on 16 August. Although he provided the assist for Rooney's winning goal in the 34th minute, Nani was replaced by Ryan Giggs at half-time.[47] On 22 August, Nani scored his first league goal of the 2009–10 season, netting a free-kick against Wigan Athletic in a 5–0 away win.[48]Following several poor performances, Nani criticised Sir Alex Ferguson for his lack of confidence in him.[49] Despite this outburst Nani was given a chance to shine and provided an assist for Rooney in the 4–0 league win over Hull City.[50] Soon after this positive display he put in another good performance in their League Cup semi-final victory over derby rivals Manchester City, revealing a heart-to-heart with Sir Alex Ferguson had resulted in a better display of form.[51] On 31 January 2010, Nani scored the first goal and set up Rooney's 100th career Premier League strike in a 3–1 league victory over Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium.[52] Nani's goal was first thought of as a Manuel Almunia own-goal by many sources, but was confirmed as belonging to Nani on 26 March by the Dubious Goals Panel.[53][54] Following this performance, Nani then set up the second of a 5–0 home win over Portsmouth.[55]
"Maturity is why we're seeing the best of him now, his last three
games have been absolutely first class but today was his best."
– Sir Alex Ferguson praises Nani after his performance in the 3-1 victory over Arsenal on 31 January 2010.[56]
On 26 March, Nani signed a new four-year contract with United, committing himself until 2014.[60] A day later, Nani took his assist tally in the league for the season to nine as he set up two goals in a 4–0 win over Bolton at the Reebok Stadium, providing goals for Dimitar Berbatov and Darron Gibson.[61] On 7 April, Nani scored his first ever European goals for United, netting two strikes in a 3–2 victory over Bayern Munich. Despite United winning the game, they were eliminated from the competition due to the away goals rule when the aggregate score was 4–4.[62] On 24 April, Nani scored his first league goal at Old Trafford for 18 months, netting United's second in a 3–1 home victory over Tottenham Hotspur.[63] On 2 May, Nani scored for the second game in a row, netting the only goal in a 1–0 away victory over SunderlandNani's third season with Manchester United ended with 34 appearances and seven goals in all competitions
2010–11 season
On 22 January, Nani scored the final goal of a 5–0 home victory over Birmingham City Nani netted United's only goal in their first league loss of the season, a 2–1 defeat at Wolves on 5 February. Seven days later Nani scored his first Manchester derby goal, opening the scoring in a 2–1 home victory over Manchester City. On 6 March, during United's 3–1 loss against Liverpool at Anfield, Nani was injured following a challenge from Jamie Carragher just before half-time. Nani came to tears after the challenge and subsequently he was stretched off the pitch. Following post-match comments to the press from Manchester United it was believed Nani had suffered a broken leg. However this was not the case as he started training the following week.It was thought that Nani would miss up to three weeks as a result of this tackle and would return in April, however, he recovered in time to play 61 minutes of a 2–1 victory over Marseille on 15 MarchHe was revealed as a contender for the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) Young Player of the Year award alongside teammate Javier Hernández on 8 April.However, many people, including Nani, expressed their surprise that he was not nominated for the main awardFollowing this nomination, he assisted both goals in a 2–0 home win over Fulham on 9 April.] Nani lost out to Jack Wilshere for the PFA Young Player of the Year award on 18 April but he was however included into the PFA Premier League Team of the Year for the first timeHe was awarded for his outstanding season as he was voted Players' Player of the Year at the club's awards night on 18 May.
2011–12 season
Nani began the new season by putting in a man of the match performance and scoring twice against derby rivals Manchester City in the 2011 Community Shield, including a 94th minute winner, as United came from two goals down to win 3–2 on 7 August 2011He scored his first league goal of the 2011–12 season by netting United's fifth goal in an 8–2 victory over Arsenal on 28 Augus Nani made his 100th Premier League appearance on 18 September as he scored in a 3–1 home win over Chelse] He scored with a long range strike after cutting inside from the right wing. He was also awarded with the man of the match. In United's following league game at the Britannia Stadium, Nani scored his third goal of the season in a 1-1 draw with Stoke City. He played a neat one-two with Darren Fletcher before slaloming his way through the defense and firing a low shot inside the left post. Nani started the match against Manchester city where they fell victim to a 1-6 beating at home to their neighbours. On 1 November, Nani was shortlisted for the prestigious FIFA Ballon d'Or one of just four Premier League players Luis Suarez, Sergio Agüero and fellow Manchester United player Wayne Rooney.[citation needed] On the 10 December, the first match after United's elimination from the UEFA Champions League, Nani scored a brace in a home game against Wolves. He opened the scoring in the 17th minute to put them 1-0 up. He carried the ball in from the sideline and pulled a shot from the middle of the D back across his body, and into the bottom left corner. He scored his second goal in the 56th minute, tapping in from Antonio Valencia's drilled cross across the six yard box to extend the lead to 3-1. He was later replaced by another winger Ashley Young as the game finished 4-1 to the home side. Nani scored his sixth league goal of the season and provided two assists in a 5-0 away win at Fulham on 21 December. He first advanced on a run down the left flank before crossing for Danny Welbeck to slot home. He then met a Ryan Giggs cross with his head, to glance United into a 2-0 lead. He then returned the compliment, squaring for Giggs to put United 3-0 up before half time. Nani sustained a foot injury from a tackle by Arsenal defender Laurent Kolscielny in the 75th minute and was replaced by fellow winger Ashley Young during United's match against Arsenal on 22 January, which resulted in a 2-1 win. After scanning his foot, Nani was feared that he may have suffered a metatarsal injury, thus not being able to play for 2 months. Nani returned to football on April 15 at United's match against Aston Villa as a substitute, replacing Ashley Young on the left wing. He scored a goal in stoppage time (93rd minute) with a low shot pass Villa keeper Shay Given from Evans' assist with a good through pass, resulting in a 4-0 win over Villa. Nani then followed this up with another goal in a 4-4 draw at Old Trafford against EvertonInternational career
Portugal under–21
Nani was the youngest member of the Portugal squad at the 2006 UEFA Under-21 Championship, making his debut on 23 May 2006 in a 0–1 defeat to France U21.He appeared in all three games, scoring no goals, before Portugal bowed out in group stages.[During the 2007 European Under-21 Football Championship, he made four appearances,scoring one goal in a 4–0 victory against Israel U21 in a group stage match on 16 June 2007,and had to be taken off during the match after a right ankle injury.Portugal senior team
[edit] Euro 2008
Nani was a regular member of the Portuguese squad in Euro 2008 qualification, and scored one of the goals in the 2–1 away win over Belgium on 2 June 2007. Nani received a call-up to Luiz Felipe Scolari's 23-man squad for Euro 2008 alongside Manchester United teammate Cristiano Ronaldo During the campaign Nani played three games and started just one, but did provide the assist for Hélder Postiga's goal during a substitute appearance in the 3–2 quarter-final defeat to Germany on 19 June[edit] Post Euro 2008–2010
Nani's fourth international goal came in Portugal's final friendly game before their World Cup qualifying campaign started, a 5-0 victory over the Faroe Islands on 20 August 2008.Nani scored the final goal of a 4–0 victory over Malta as Portugal started qualification for the 2010 World Cup on 6 September. He opened the scoring in the 3-2 home loss against Denmark four days later. Nani helped Portugal book a play-off place for the World Cup as he netted in the 4-0 home win over Malta on 14 October 2009 Nani was influential in the play-off against Bosnia and Herzegovina, setting up Bruno Alves for the only goal in the first leg.[106] Raul Meireles' goal in the second-leg sealed Portugal's place at the World Cup in South Africa.[107] On 1 June 2010, Nani netted Portugal's third in a 3–1 victory over Cameroo Following that game Nani was named in Carlos Queiroz 23-man squad for the tournament, However on 8 June, Nani was ruled out of the tournament through a shoulder injury and was replaced by Benfica midfielder Ruben AmorimEuro 2012 qualifying
Nani scored twice and assisted once in Paulo Bento's first game in charge of Portugal in a 3–1 Euro 2012 qualifying win over Denmark on 8 October 2010.[111]Nani scored twice and set up another again in a 5-3 win over Iceland on October 7, 2011.
MU is not "Throw the Towel"
Manchester United's chances to retain the Premier League title is not too large. Despite that case, stronghold of the 'Red Devils' will not give up and keep their hopes.
MU is currently in second place standings with 86 points from 37 parties. The number of points they are equal with Manchester City at the top, but lost on goal difference.
Towards the last game on Sunday (5/13/2012), the City is favored to win first league title since 1968. On the other hand, Manchester United need a little magic to scuttle rival rekotanya it.
In the final match, the City will host the team that just got away very bad record, Queens Park Rangers. Meanwhile, Manchester United have come to the headquarters Sunderland.
For the champions, Manchester United not only have to beat Sunderland. They also have to wait for the results obtained City. If the Citizens win, the team made by Sir Alex Ferguson is going to bite the fingers.
Indeed there are other scenarios to prevent the City championship. However, it is almost impossible for United to pursue excellence goal difference of 8 owned CIty.
"We must not lose hope. We must fight until the end," said the Manchester United winger, Antonio Valencia, told The Sun.
"I know the City is a favorite, but QPR struggling for their own safety and avoid relegation. That's a slight advantage for us," he added.
"If QPR get any positive result at home to City, then the whole United squad will be their fans," said the player from Ecuador this.
MU is currently in second place standings with 86 points from 37 parties. The number of points they are equal with Manchester City at the top, but lost on goal difference.
Towards the last game on Sunday (5/13/2012), the City is favored to win first league title since 1968. On the other hand, Manchester United need a little magic to scuttle rival rekotanya it.
In the final match, the City will host the team that just got away very bad record, Queens Park Rangers. Meanwhile, Manchester United have come to the headquarters Sunderland.
For the champions, Manchester United not only have to beat Sunderland. They also have to wait for the results obtained City. If the Citizens win, the team made by Sir Alex Ferguson is going to bite the fingers.
Indeed there are other scenarios to prevent the City championship. However, it is almost impossible for United to pursue excellence goal difference of 8 owned CIty.
"We must not lose hope. We must fight until the end," said the Manchester United winger, Antonio Valencia, told The Sun.
"I know the City is a favorite, but QPR struggling for their own safety and avoid relegation. That's a slight advantage for us," he added.
"If QPR get any positive result at home to City, then the whole United squad will be their fans," said the player from Ecuador this.
MU belum "lempar handuk"
Kans Manchester United untuk mempertahankan titel Premier League tidak
terlalu besar. Kendati demikan, kubu 'Setan Merah' tak mau menyerah dan
tetap menjaga harapan mereka.
MU saat ini ada di urutan kedua klasemen dengan 86 poin dari 37 partai. Jumlah poin mereka sama dengan Manchester City yang ada di puncak, namun kalah selisih gol.
Menjelang laga terakhir pada hari Minggu (13/5/2012) ini, City sangat diunggulkan bisa merebut gelar liga pertama sejak 1968. Di sisi lain, MU butuh sedikit keajaiban untuk menjegal rival rekotanya itu.
Di laga pamungkas, City cuma akan menjamu tim yang punya rekor tandang sangat buruk, Queens Park Rangers. Sementara itu, MU harus bertandang ke markas Sunderland.
Untuk juara, MU tak hanya harus mengalahkan Sunderland. Mereka juga harus menunggu hasil yang didapat City. Kalau The Citizens menang, maka tim besutan Sir Alex Ferguson ini akan gigit jari.
Memang ada skenario lainnya untuk mencegah City juara. Namun, rasanya hampir mustahil bagi MU mengejar keunggulan selisih 8 gol yang dimiliki CIty.
"Kami tak boleh kehilangan harapan. Kami harus berjuang sampai saat paling akhir," ujar winger MU, Antonio Valencia, kepada The Sun.
"Saya tahu City adalah favorit, namun QPR berjuang untuk keselamatan mereka sendiri dan menghindari degradasi. Itu sedikit keuntungan buat kami," imbuhnya.
"Kalau QPR mendapatkan hasil positif apa pun di kandang City, maka seluruh skuad United akan menjadi fans mereka," kata pemain asal Ekuador ini.
MU saat ini ada di urutan kedua klasemen dengan 86 poin dari 37 partai. Jumlah poin mereka sama dengan Manchester City yang ada di puncak, namun kalah selisih gol.
Menjelang laga terakhir pada hari Minggu (13/5/2012) ini, City sangat diunggulkan bisa merebut gelar liga pertama sejak 1968. Di sisi lain, MU butuh sedikit keajaiban untuk menjegal rival rekotanya itu.
Di laga pamungkas, City cuma akan menjamu tim yang punya rekor tandang sangat buruk, Queens Park Rangers. Sementara itu, MU harus bertandang ke markas Sunderland.
Untuk juara, MU tak hanya harus mengalahkan Sunderland. Mereka juga harus menunggu hasil yang didapat City. Kalau The Citizens menang, maka tim besutan Sir Alex Ferguson ini akan gigit jari.
Memang ada skenario lainnya untuk mencegah City juara. Namun, rasanya hampir mustahil bagi MU mengejar keunggulan selisih 8 gol yang dimiliki CIty.
"Kami tak boleh kehilangan harapan. Kami harus berjuang sampai saat paling akhir," ujar winger MU, Antonio Valencia, kepada The Sun.
"Saya tahu City adalah favorit, namun QPR berjuang untuk keselamatan mereka sendiri dan menghindari degradasi. Itu sedikit keuntungan buat kami," imbuhnya.
"Kalau QPR mendapatkan hasil positif apa pun di kandang City, maka seluruh skuad United akan menjadi fans mereka," kata pemain asal Ekuador ini.
Rabu, 09 Mei 2012
Hasil akhir pertandingan sepak bola
Italian Serie A
English
Premier League
Spanish La
Liga
Bundesliga
Jerman
Uefa Champions
League
Other Match
Lve story of different religions
".... Because of love strong as death,persistent
enthusiasm as the grave,flame is the flame of the Lord!,plenty of water can not
quench love. "~ Song of
Solomon 8:6-7I. IntroductionOften marriage posed
essentially the statement that love is something that is subtle and
penetrate the boundary. Said to be subtle (fine / subtle)
because it is mysterious. No one is able to exactly
understand why, how and when love comes, bloom and warm the heart. Presumably from there and then
popularized plural idiom "fall in love," given the presence of love that
all of a sudden, like someone who suddenly bounced and crashed. And is said to penetrate the border because it's a necessity of
love. All
building the separation wall that cooked up by people such as race,
peoples, tribes, cultures, languages, rules, ideology and religion, in
fact, could not stem the flame of love. Because the flame is the flame of the
Lord! Thus the
word-Song of Solomon.Once a child sucked in the
vortex of human love, it is true that nothing substantive can hinder
unity. And if forced to
split up anyway, then it will be new stories emerge; love story set in a
kind of tragedy Romeo and Juliet or Siti Nurbaya. Therefore not an overstatement that the Song
of Songs in the Old Testament gives a very deep appreciation of the
greatness of love: "As soon as passionate love, the rivers can not
quench, and carry her away."Thus the
essence of love is something sacred, sacred. Sourced from
the depths of the divine love itself.That the
way love is no longer sacred and profane contaminated by many influences
that come from human flesh, so that the glow of love to fade or even
disappear, then that's another matter. But respect is
something you absolutely love.So in
order to sustain and seek the support structure for the existence of
love, the institution of marriage was then present and prominent. And those who want to establish a marriage
in principle not be prevented. One
of the most violent criminals were allowed, secured in the name of love
and Human Rights, should not be prohibited if the request hold a
marriage. Consequently, the same is
ideally applied to a pair of human children of different religions ....
Married different religions, why not?II.
Mating of
different religions (interference) in the BibleIf you look at the stories of marriage in the Old
Testament, there is denial, or in other words, the word is NOT the
phrase interfaith marriages.(See story of Deuteronomy. 7:1-11, Exodus.
34:12-16; Malachi. 2:10-15; Ezra. 2:59-62; Nehemiah. 7:61-64;
13:23-29.) As the search of my friend, the
Rev. Andrew Purnawan, background rejection is the understanding that
when the marriage of different religions do the people of Yahweh which
are quantitatively much smaller than the number of people / other people
of different faiths would be threatened fade.On the basis of the disappearance Yahwehisme concern,
for reasons of securing identities, as well as the conservation of the
number of adherents of the faith a little, then comes the marriage ban
and the rejection of different religious / ethnic difference. Yahweh's people should
only marry a fellow people of Yahweh, should not marry a goyim / are
not the people of Yahweh.But the Rev. Andrew Purnawan based search, there is no
doubt also that the reality of the encounter with other civilizations
and diverse ethnic groups, making the marriage of different religions as
an inevitable reality. Andrew noted that, even the "great men" of Israel was
experienced, as shown in:
* Genesis. 38 :1-2 (Judah Syua married, a woman of Canaan)
* Genesis. 46: 10 (Simeon married the woman of Canaan)
* Genesis. 41:45 (Joseph married Asenath, the son of Potiphera, priest of On-Egypt)
* Genesis. 26:34 (with Judith Esau, the son of Beeri the Hittite)
* Numbers. 12:1 (Moses - the leaders of Israel - married a Cushite woman)And in certain contexts even permitted. As found in Deuteronomy 21:10-14. which is a series of passages that speak of the laws of war established for the children of Israel (see Deut. 20-21: 14). Andrew revealed that this section clearly set when Israel won the war, captured enemy among them women attractive, then she should be treated humanely, respected the rights-haknya.Lalu "so-so after that you approached her and became her husband, so that she becomes your wife. "In this context non-Israel/yang marriage with women of other faiths are allowed so people do not fall in the sin of war crimes, in this barbaric treatment of women prisoners of war.In the New Testament (NT).Andri penelusurannya Purnawan in the New Testament records the use of text 2 Cor. 6:14, which reads "Be ye not unequally yoked with those who do not believe it. Because equality is there between righteousness and iniquity? Or how can light unite with darkness? "Which is a favorite text, the most often cited to legitimize banning mating with people of different faiths.But if you consider the context, Andri explained that the verse actually not intended to prohibit or to support a Christian married to a non-Christian, but rather is intended for those who are newly converted, but her partner is still a long held belief. The goal is clear, namely that Christians / converts, actually implementing the holiness of his life and no longer fall within the life of impurity which is still a lifestyle mate. They are called to transmit the positive influence of an unbelieving spouse. Paul still prohibit people of different Christian faith divorces a spouse, unless the spouse who wants (see I Cor. 7:12-16, I Peter 3:1-7).So therefore, according to the search Andri above, can put forward a new subject of chastity.In Judaism developing halal-haram law. When the holy see of impurity, the sacred defeated by the impurity, by the unclean. From that evolved the concept of radical separation that separates a dichotomy between the sacred-they-with-they are unclean.But in the New Testament concept was overhauled.The scriptures do not need to be divorced by the impurity. Ransom people do not need to separate themselves from people who were not ransom. Because not only are unclean / impure are able to influence. The sacred was also able to influence the impurity. "For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband" (1 Corinthians 7:14). And the fact is according to the Rev.. DR Bambang Ruseno an extraordinary proclamation.Gusti Jesus himself, through the action of reaching out to people affected by leprosy, the Samaritan woman, the woman who got the bleeding, and a collection of other human beings-who in the tradition of Judaism claimed to be the class of impure / unclean-in essence has unraveled an understanding of the sanctity of the original is closed / exclusive to open / inclusive. And of course the spirit of this understanding forward and re-echoed by Paul as his disciples in the pastoral letters, including to the Corinthians.If the mating was associated with different religions, but when considered impure different, theologically marriage was not always mean that the scriptures will be defiled by the unclean, so that should be banned. It can mean the opposite: the unclean and very likely influenced by the sacred through the testimony of real everyday life. So it should not be banned.III. Mating of different religions: from the history of the Church to the Dutch East IndiesScisma II or split the church in the range of 1500-1800 between Catholics versus Protestants actually preceded by a dispute in the realm of teaching. Which then spread and lead to conflict (seizure) of power politically. Disputes, in turn, inevitably raises the gap.According to Gandhi LM SH (in: "Implementation of the Marriage Law in the Christian perspective," CPC-GM, 1994, p 131) was originally forbidden Catholics to marry non-Catholics. And given the powerful Catholic church in Europe was originally a marriage subject to the laws and regulations of the church. Therefore the application of marriage law is rigid and exclusive.However, in line with the spirit of reform that swept the age, in turn timbulah protests in Europe and the turmoil of rebellion against the authority of the church. Then the post-revolutionary France, finally diundangkanlah Civil Code. Thereby obtaining a new round of marriage; organized as a secular matter, arranged in a distinguished civil law and no longer in the realm of authority of the church / religion. Consequently a person may request to be listed by the State marriage (legitimatio), but did not feel the need to ask the blessing (konfirmatio) at the church.At the time of the Dutch East Indies, originally in order to prevent mixing of identity that was allegedly able to demolish the building "caste" who made the ruling, then the VOC emphasizes separation / segregation closely. And when in 1799 the VOC transferred sovereignty to the hands of the Dutch Government, the policy of banning marriage "interference" is also still in place. That is, the Dutch prohibited marriage with indigenous / native. Indonesia Christian people also prohibited marriage with non-Christians. As a result, many couples are trying to get around to doing "cohabiting" or hidden marriage.But given the dynamics of encounters between people who are so abstruse it should be inhibited, the development along with publication of a new awareness of the existence of the love-it-it should not be hindered in 1848 interfaith marriage ban was lifted. Dutch government then issued a rule and the underlying substantive law marriages "religious differences" are referred to as: Regeling op de Gemengde Huwelijk abbreviated GHR, Staatsblaad.1989 no 158.In the GHR Article 7 paragraph 2 contained a clause which reads:"... The difference of religion, or national origin by no means an obstacle to marriage."IV. Marriage law No. 1/1974 and its implications for inter-religious marriagesWhen Indonesia Merdeka in 1945, appears to independently regulate the spirit of the foundation for life on earth with Indonesia, which is based on Pancasila. Later in the process and dibahaslah filed a bill (the bill) that marriage is based on Pancasila, the National nature, applies to all citizens and ensure legal certainty.Original article 2, paragraph 1 of Marriage bill reads:"The marriage is valid if performed in the presence of registrar staffmarriage, recorded in the marriage registrar by the employee, and carried out according to the provisions of this Act or the provisions of the law of marriage and the parties to the marriage, to the extent not in conflict with this Act "(Albert Hasibuan, Some Basic Thoughts About Resolution "mixed marriages, in the Implementation of the Marriage Law in the Christian perspective, Jakarta: BPK-GM, 1994, hlm77-79)But according to Albert Hasibuan, the bill will then have a reaction and outcry from groups that want the force of religious law in the regulation of marriage. Strong reactions not only about the validity of marriage, but also about the principle of monogamy, divorce, guardianship, including the article (11) subsection (2) the bill contains a provision that allows the mating of different religions.So when the Marriage Act was passed, there was provision that is compromised. Albert reveals that the Marriage Law No. 1/1974 says religious law imposed a compromise due to positive law, the laws of the State: at the end of Article 2, paragraph 1 of Law No. 1/1974 reads:"Marriage is lawful, if done according to the laws of each religion and belief"So that was originally in the draft bill, the marriage is legitimate if it is done in the presence of the State, now the marriage is legitimate when conducted according to the laws of each religion and belief. And about the mating of different religions in the Bill of article 11 paragraph 2 be eliminated (in-drop). However, confusion still arises in the interpretation of the implementation. Mainly concerned with interfaith marriages.In the article 57 of Law No.1/1974 was organized about intermarriage, and the question is:"... A marriage between two people in Indonesia are subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and citizenship Indonesia one of the parties."While for marriage "mix" between two people of different faiths are not regulated at all. Then clearly there is a legal vacuum. Thus it can be understood if the reason "lack of rules" are often used as justification / basis of justification of the Civil Registry, religious institutions, even the Church, in order to reject those who want to establish a marriage of different religions.However, if observed in the transitional provisions of Article 66 of Law No.1/1974, there is a statement which reads:"For marriage and all things related to marriage based on this Act, then the enactment of this Act, the provisions set forth in the Book of the Civil Code Act (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Indonesia Christian Marriage Ordinance (Ordinance Huwelijk Christen Indonesiers 74 S. 1933), Mixed Marriage Regulation (Regeling Op De Gemengde Huwelijken No.158 S.1898), other rules and regulations governing marriage has been arranged so far in this Act, declared null and void. "Therefore, according to Albert Hasibuan, by basing itself on the interpretation of "a-contratio" or commentary that compares the differences and see the reverse side, then the phrase "so far has been set", can actually mean that the Mixed Marriage Regulation (Regeling Op De Gemengde Huwelijken S. No. 1898 158, which is abbreviated GHR) remains valid, and can be used, given that the rules on inter-religious marriages do not exist and has not been regulated in the Act no1/1974.V. Ecclesiological consequencesArticle 66 in the issuance of certificates in turn underlie the MPL-PGI COURT DECREE NUMBER 01/MPL-PGI/1989 Regarding Understanding of Churches in Indonesia about the legality of Marriage and Marital Citizens For Different Religions. Provisions outlined in the trial Communion of Churches in Indonesia (PGI) in Wisma Kinasih, Caringin, Bogor on 29 April 1989, also set ecclesiological consequences; that the church can bless the marriage of different religions.Then what about the Christian Greja Wetan Jawi?As a basic gait and movement of the church steps, the Tata and Pranata GKJW tersebutlah published in 1996 General Assembly. Within the institution of marriage is in no way associated with the struggle accommodated interfaith marriage. In Chapter IV.Hal Specifically, Article 16, even the faint echo paradigm of exclusivism, when it disclosed that:"If there is a husband and wife are one of them to Christianity, marriage can not be ratified by ecclesiastical"Thus the marriage is considered valid by ecclesiastical are those who are both Christian. If only one who adheres to Christianity it is not legitimate. While the true biblical clearly contrary to the spirit of understanding 1 Corinthians 7:14 a patterned inclusive.In fact, GKJW are facing struggles of interfaith marriages. Even strategically GKJW had corresponded directly with the Director General of the Ministry of Religious Affairs BIMAS Christian, Questioning the marriage of different religions, which are then repaid by September 29, 1976.In the reply letter, expressed approval of the RI BIMAS Christian Religious Affairs GKJW conclusions and explanations related to article 66 of Law No.1/1974, namely:a. Things that are regulated in Law No. 1/1974, the existing regulations do not apply, because the regulations are the rules now.b. On matters that are not already in UU1/1974, then the existing rules can be used to solve these problems, thereby article (75) of HOCI is still valid.Only, when it is used as the basis for legal arguments GKJW interfaith marriage but not the GHR HOCI / Huwelijk Ordonatie Indonesier Christen, chapter 75, which also regulates the provision of inter-religious marriages.Thus on the one hand, textually, based on the Tata-Pranata 1996, GKJW look adopts exclusivism. Closed to the possibility of interfaith marriages. Thanks to the marriage is understood only exclusively dedicated to fellow ransom. Thus for a husband and wife that one of them to Christianity, marriage can not be passed by the church.Though in principle, the church is not Kristus.Gereja is not a source of blessing, but is merely a means to embody the blessing that comes from God alone.On the other hand, are factual, GKJW in actual praxis seems not simply turn a blind eye to the dynamics of the context that requires attention and real care. The proof, as there are people who struggle related to the existence of different religions want to marry, GKJW not remain silent. There is an effort to serve and embrace. Service and commitment shown by the presence of at least a "letter of advocacy / advocacy 'submissions to the BIMAS PHMA Christian Religious Affairs of Indonesia in 1976 that give advice and seek approval for the use of HOCI legal basis of article 75, to support the implementation of interfaith marriages in a constitutional manner.So, keeping in mind that God is good for everyone and full of grace to which maketh (Ps. 145:9), and taking into account the theme of Development Activity Program (PKP) GKJW which has always been oriented in an effort to be a blessing to others and the world, GKJW need to emphasize the stance that, in principle, Kristen Jawi Greja Wetan recognize and appreciate the marriage of different religions.When this principle is approved, it means GKJW dare assert that religion as a result of human construction should not be used to negate / exclude love as something ultimate and sacred.Consequently, the order / institution that is written must also be revised to align with the principles held. The next consequence, if there are couples who want to ask the blessing of interfaith marriage, the Assembly of the Church are not allowed to refuse and should continue to serve him. Included also accompanied the process to the Civil Registry, or to the District Court, in order to get a jurisprudence that can be used as a basis for civil registration.VI. Some caveats and technical difficulties.However it does not mean marriage is not confronted with obstacles of different religions. I noted some caveats that emerged, one that was brought up by my friend Andrew Purnawan:"Inequality ethical moral standard in a family could have happened. And quite possibly be the beginning of a major disaster in family life, especially if the family is dealing with domestic problems. For example: one forbids divorce, while others may say. Embrace the principle that a monogamous, others say the origins of polygamy may be unfair, and many other issues, including concerns regarding the food halal / haram, there is not a table in the house of worship, etc.. There is again a question of principle. Who is the head of household? Certainly no longer the Christ. The family impact may not be able to play a role in answering the apostolic duty to be salt and shine for Christ. If forced to continue running its own? Can! But the family is healthy is that? "The argument above is correct. It's very possible. But first, the danger of division and inability to tolerate differences / inequalities of moral standards, his life is not just merely be a risk that must be faced by those who hold different religious marriage only, but a risk and danger to be anticipated in any wise by all the partners who built the household, any religion. Management and policy is necessary for those who are diving interfaith marriages, but by no means be claimed once only, that as if they are married religious differences are much more prone to experiencing catastrophic when compared with those who are married co-religionists.Is a knife that has a risk factor could potentially injure your hands and be used as a tool of murder should be banned its existence? Not so is not it?!. Although the risk, but it does not mean that the existence of the knife should be altogether banned.Then so is the marriage of different religions. The existence of risk in a marriage two people of different religions, can not be taken for granted at the conclusion to negate / forbid interfaith marriage.That then it is necessary to provide Touchstone describing in detail the risk factors in a marriage of different religions, it is the duty of the Church in order to explain and assist in the process of special religious instruction.The second, related assumption triumphalistis, who claimed that families of different religions will not be able to answer the apostolic duty to be salt and light. I think the assumption is made exclusively through the lens, with an emphasis that only the color of the one who can bring in the mission. Different colors are not.So instead, is there any guarantee that the color / Christian family can completely bring in salt and light, and imposed a missionary Dei completely and totally?If a true salt and light associated with the daily behavior, manifested through speech, thought and action that surrounded you, then it would not be possible for families of different religions to bring harmony and peace through the story of their daily lives?I think the possibility is always open. And when put something good, beautiful, delicious to hear, which is based on love and truth are present and appear as the fruit of life of families of different religions, it is not true it is also an attempt enforcement of the will of God?In John 14:15 Jesus said Gusti, "If ye love me, keep my commandments." And in John 15:17 Jesus Gusti said that: "These commandments unto you: Love one another."So when families of different religions impose real love, would not they be called a family who keep the commandments of God and let the values of Christ as the head of their household and menutun?Which means indirectly also be called as a family headed by Christ himself is not it?!Technical difficultiesSome questions related to technical difficulties.
* How to form N1-N5 are made assuming the same religion?
* How did the ID cards required by the registrar must co-religionists?Given the marriage of different religions is a special case, then the N1-N5 form to be filled according to the procedure, and include the ID card as well as it is. Religion does not need to be engineered to be equated. When records are not willing to accept the filing of civil marriage and religious differences have been refused even though the arguments proffered by basing on the transitional provisions of Law No. 1/1974 article 66, which allows entry into force of HGR / HOCI, then it means Greja must have a special wisdom.Basis for specific policy is Law No. 1/74 of article 2, paragraph 1, which states that "lawful marriage of each religion."So then, congregation council has the authority to certify the marriage of different religions and create a Certificate of Approval Marriage Different Religion / SuTaPKaBA (that meet the rule "in accordance with the laws of each religion"). After that SuTaPKaBA given to the civil registry to be listed. However if the parties still refuse Civil, and not willing to accept, then the basis of the refusal letter, requested the District Court jurisprudence that issued the warrant listing.
* What if there is going to hold inter-religious marriage, but are not willing to be blessed in the church?Then, as told by Rev.. Sumardiyono-mechanism can be set through a special trial of the Church Assembly sole agenda is to approve the marriage of different religions. In it there is no blessing. Only prayer.
* What if there are willing to be blessed in church, but still ask for recognition and appreciation of differences in beliefs espoused?Why not. That is, the church can bring religious leaders in accordance with the religion professed by one of the bride. As enacted in GKJ Salatiga, the blessing of marriage can be performed by a priest and kiai, simultaneously at the same time, using a special liturgy.Behind all of this, everything technical is essentially just follow the things that are of principle. So when the church decided in principle to transform itself from a paradigm of faith exclusive / closed to the paradigm of faith that is inclusive / open, then that can be arranged with the technical base themselves on matters of principle. Finally, inter-religious marriage in a particular context, if it should happen ... why not. ***Reference material:- Marriage Law 1 of 1974.- Rev. Andri Purnawan, Different Religions Marriages, Could it be?, In a post on www.gkjwcaruban.org/ ....- Weinata Sairin, Pattiasina JM, ed., Implementation of the Marriage Law in Christian Perspective, set the study of marriage in the environment: the Communion of Churches in Indonesia, BPK-GM, 1994.-Procedures and Kristen Jawi Greja Pranata Wetan, General Assembly GKJW, 1996
* Genesis. 38 :1-2 (Judah Syua married, a woman of Canaan)
* Genesis. 46: 10 (Simeon married the woman of Canaan)
* Genesis. 41:45 (Joseph married Asenath, the son of Potiphera, priest of On-Egypt)
* Genesis. 26:34 (with Judith Esau, the son of Beeri the Hittite)
* Numbers. 12:1 (Moses - the leaders of Israel - married a Cushite woman)And in certain contexts even permitted. As found in Deuteronomy 21:10-14. which is a series of passages that speak of the laws of war established for the children of Israel (see Deut. 20-21: 14). Andrew revealed that this section clearly set when Israel won the war, captured enemy among them women attractive, then she should be treated humanely, respected the rights-haknya.Lalu "so-so after that you approached her and became her husband, so that she becomes your wife. "In this context non-Israel/yang marriage with women of other faiths are allowed so people do not fall in the sin of war crimes, in this barbaric treatment of women prisoners of war.In the New Testament (NT).Andri penelusurannya Purnawan in the New Testament records the use of text 2 Cor. 6:14, which reads "Be ye not unequally yoked with those who do not believe it. Because equality is there between righteousness and iniquity? Or how can light unite with darkness? "Which is a favorite text, the most often cited to legitimize banning mating with people of different faiths.But if you consider the context, Andri explained that the verse actually not intended to prohibit or to support a Christian married to a non-Christian, but rather is intended for those who are newly converted, but her partner is still a long held belief. The goal is clear, namely that Christians / converts, actually implementing the holiness of his life and no longer fall within the life of impurity which is still a lifestyle mate. They are called to transmit the positive influence of an unbelieving spouse. Paul still prohibit people of different Christian faith divorces a spouse, unless the spouse who wants (see I Cor. 7:12-16, I Peter 3:1-7).So therefore, according to the search Andri above, can put forward a new subject of chastity.In Judaism developing halal-haram law. When the holy see of impurity, the sacred defeated by the impurity, by the unclean. From that evolved the concept of radical separation that separates a dichotomy between the sacred-they-with-they are unclean.But in the New Testament concept was overhauled.The scriptures do not need to be divorced by the impurity. Ransom people do not need to separate themselves from people who were not ransom. Because not only are unclean / impure are able to influence. The sacred was also able to influence the impurity. "For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband" (1 Corinthians 7:14). And the fact is according to the Rev.. DR Bambang Ruseno an extraordinary proclamation.Gusti Jesus himself, through the action of reaching out to people affected by leprosy, the Samaritan woman, the woman who got the bleeding, and a collection of other human beings-who in the tradition of Judaism claimed to be the class of impure / unclean-in essence has unraveled an understanding of the sanctity of the original is closed / exclusive to open / inclusive. And of course the spirit of this understanding forward and re-echoed by Paul as his disciples in the pastoral letters, including to the Corinthians.If the mating was associated with different religions, but when considered impure different, theologically marriage was not always mean that the scriptures will be defiled by the unclean, so that should be banned. It can mean the opposite: the unclean and very likely influenced by the sacred through the testimony of real everyday life. So it should not be banned.III. Mating of different religions: from the history of the Church to the Dutch East IndiesScisma II or split the church in the range of 1500-1800 between Catholics versus Protestants actually preceded by a dispute in the realm of teaching. Which then spread and lead to conflict (seizure) of power politically. Disputes, in turn, inevitably raises the gap.According to Gandhi LM SH (in: "Implementation of the Marriage Law in the Christian perspective," CPC-GM, 1994, p 131) was originally forbidden Catholics to marry non-Catholics. And given the powerful Catholic church in Europe was originally a marriage subject to the laws and regulations of the church. Therefore the application of marriage law is rigid and exclusive.However, in line with the spirit of reform that swept the age, in turn timbulah protests in Europe and the turmoil of rebellion against the authority of the church. Then the post-revolutionary France, finally diundangkanlah Civil Code. Thereby obtaining a new round of marriage; organized as a secular matter, arranged in a distinguished civil law and no longer in the realm of authority of the church / religion. Consequently a person may request to be listed by the State marriage (legitimatio), but did not feel the need to ask the blessing (konfirmatio) at the church.At the time of the Dutch East Indies, originally in order to prevent mixing of identity that was allegedly able to demolish the building "caste" who made the ruling, then the VOC emphasizes separation / segregation closely. And when in 1799 the VOC transferred sovereignty to the hands of the Dutch Government, the policy of banning marriage "interference" is also still in place. That is, the Dutch prohibited marriage with indigenous / native. Indonesia Christian people also prohibited marriage with non-Christians. As a result, many couples are trying to get around to doing "cohabiting" or hidden marriage.But given the dynamics of encounters between people who are so abstruse it should be inhibited, the development along with publication of a new awareness of the existence of the love-it-it should not be hindered in 1848 interfaith marriage ban was lifted. Dutch government then issued a rule and the underlying substantive law marriages "religious differences" are referred to as: Regeling op de Gemengde Huwelijk abbreviated GHR, Staatsblaad.1989 no 158.In the GHR Article 7 paragraph 2 contained a clause which reads:"... The difference of religion, or national origin by no means an obstacle to marriage."IV. Marriage law No. 1/1974 and its implications for inter-religious marriagesWhen Indonesia Merdeka in 1945, appears to independently regulate the spirit of the foundation for life on earth with Indonesia, which is based on Pancasila. Later in the process and dibahaslah filed a bill (the bill) that marriage is based on Pancasila, the National nature, applies to all citizens and ensure legal certainty.Original article 2, paragraph 1 of Marriage bill reads:"The marriage is valid if performed in the presence of registrar staffmarriage, recorded in the marriage registrar by the employee, and carried out according to the provisions of this Act or the provisions of the law of marriage and the parties to the marriage, to the extent not in conflict with this Act "(Albert Hasibuan, Some Basic Thoughts About Resolution "mixed marriages, in the Implementation of the Marriage Law in the Christian perspective, Jakarta: BPK-GM, 1994, hlm77-79)But according to Albert Hasibuan, the bill will then have a reaction and outcry from groups that want the force of religious law in the regulation of marriage. Strong reactions not only about the validity of marriage, but also about the principle of monogamy, divorce, guardianship, including the article (11) subsection (2) the bill contains a provision that allows the mating of different religions.So when the Marriage Act was passed, there was provision that is compromised. Albert reveals that the Marriage Law No. 1/1974 says religious law imposed a compromise due to positive law, the laws of the State: at the end of Article 2, paragraph 1 of Law No. 1/1974 reads:"Marriage is lawful, if done according to the laws of each religion and belief"So that was originally in the draft bill, the marriage is legitimate if it is done in the presence of the State, now the marriage is legitimate when conducted according to the laws of each religion and belief. And about the mating of different religions in the Bill of article 11 paragraph 2 be eliminated (in-drop). However, confusion still arises in the interpretation of the implementation. Mainly concerned with interfaith marriages.In the article 57 of Law No.1/1974 was organized about intermarriage, and the question is:"... A marriage between two people in Indonesia are subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and citizenship Indonesia one of the parties."While for marriage "mix" between two people of different faiths are not regulated at all. Then clearly there is a legal vacuum. Thus it can be understood if the reason "lack of rules" are often used as justification / basis of justification of the Civil Registry, religious institutions, even the Church, in order to reject those who want to establish a marriage of different religions.However, if observed in the transitional provisions of Article 66 of Law No.1/1974, there is a statement which reads:"For marriage and all things related to marriage based on this Act, then the enactment of this Act, the provisions set forth in the Book of the Civil Code Act (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Indonesia Christian Marriage Ordinance (Ordinance Huwelijk Christen Indonesiers 74 S. 1933), Mixed Marriage Regulation (Regeling Op De Gemengde Huwelijken No.158 S.1898), other rules and regulations governing marriage has been arranged so far in this Act, declared null and void. "Therefore, according to Albert Hasibuan, by basing itself on the interpretation of "a-contratio" or commentary that compares the differences and see the reverse side, then the phrase "so far has been set", can actually mean that the Mixed Marriage Regulation (Regeling Op De Gemengde Huwelijken S. No. 1898 158, which is abbreviated GHR) remains valid, and can be used, given that the rules on inter-religious marriages do not exist and has not been regulated in the Act no1/1974.V. Ecclesiological consequencesArticle 66 in the issuance of certificates in turn underlie the MPL-PGI COURT DECREE NUMBER 01/MPL-PGI/1989 Regarding Understanding of Churches in Indonesia about the legality of Marriage and Marital Citizens For Different Religions. Provisions outlined in the trial Communion of Churches in Indonesia (PGI) in Wisma Kinasih, Caringin, Bogor on 29 April 1989, also set ecclesiological consequences; that the church can bless the marriage of different religions.Then what about the Christian Greja Wetan Jawi?As a basic gait and movement of the church steps, the Tata and Pranata GKJW tersebutlah published in 1996 General Assembly. Within the institution of marriage is in no way associated with the struggle accommodated interfaith marriage. In Chapter IV.Hal Specifically, Article 16, even the faint echo paradigm of exclusivism, when it disclosed that:"If there is a husband and wife are one of them to Christianity, marriage can not be ratified by ecclesiastical"Thus the marriage is considered valid by ecclesiastical are those who are both Christian. If only one who adheres to Christianity it is not legitimate. While the true biblical clearly contrary to the spirit of understanding 1 Corinthians 7:14 a patterned inclusive.In fact, GKJW are facing struggles of interfaith marriages. Even strategically GKJW had corresponded directly with the Director General of the Ministry of Religious Affairs BIMAS Christian, Questioning the marriage of different religions, which are then repaid by September 29, 1976.In the reply letter, expressed approval of the RI BIMAS Christian Religious Affairs GKJW conclusions and explanations related to article 66 of Law No.1/1974, namely:a. Things that are regulated in Law No. 1/1974, the existing regulations do not apply, because the regulations are the rules now.b. On matters that are not already in UU1/1974, then the existing rules can be used to solve these problems, thereby article (75) of HOCI is still valid.Only, when it is used as the basis for legal arguments GKJW interfaith marriage but not the GHR HOCI / Huwelijk Ordonatie Indonesier Christen, chapter 75, which also regulates the provision of inter-religious marriages.Thus on the one hand, textually, based on the Tata-Pranata 1996, GKJW look adopts exclusivism. Closed to the possibility of interfaith marriages. Thanks to the marriage is understood only exclusively dedicated to fellow ransom. Thus for a husband and wife that one of them to Christianity, marriage can not be passed by the church.Though in principle, the church is not Kristus.Gereja is not a source of blessing, but is merely a means to embody the blessing that comes from God alone.On the other hand, are factual, GKJW in actual praxis seems not simply turn a blind eye to the dynamics of the context that requires attention and real care. The proof, as there are people who struggle related to the existence of different religions want to marry, GKJW not remain silent. There is an effort to serve and embrace. Service and commitment shown by the presence of at least a "letter of advocacy / advocacy 'submissions to the BIMAS PHMA Christian Religious Affairs of Indonesia in 1976 that give advice and seek approval for the use of HOCI legal basis of article 75, to support the implementation of interfaith marriages in a constitutional manner.So, keeping in mind that God is good for everyone and full of grace to which maketh (Ps. 145:9), and taking into account the theme of Development Activity Program (PKP) GKJW which has always been oriented in an effort to be a blessing to others and the world, GKJW need to emphasize the stance that, in principle, Kristen Jawi Greja Wetan recognize and appreciate the marriage of different religions.When this principle is approved, it means GKJW dare assert that religion as a result of human construction should not be used to negate / exclude love as something ultimate and sacred.Consequently, the order / institution that is written must also be revised to align with the principles held. The next consequence, if there are couples who want to ask the blessing of interfaith marriage, the Assembly of the Church are not allowed to refuse and should continue to serve him. Included also accompanied the process to the Civil Registry, or to the District Court, in order to get a jurisprudence that can be used as a basis for civil registration.VI. Some caveats and technical difficulties.However it does not mean marriage is not confronted with obstacles of different religions. I noted some caveats that emerged, one that was brought up by my friend Andrew Purnawan:"Inequality ethical moral standard in a family could have happened. And quite possibly be the beginning of a major disaster in family life, especially if the family is dealing with domestic problems. For example: one forbids divorce, while others may say. Embrace the principle that a monogamous, others say the origins of polygamy may be unfair, and many other issues, including concerns regarding the food halal / haram, there is not a table in the house of worship, etc.. There is again a question of principle. Who is the head of household? Certainly no longer the Christ. The family impact may not be able to play a role in answering the apostolic duty to be salt and shine for Christ. If forced to continue running its own? Can! But the family is healthy is that? "The argument above is correct. It's very possible. But first, the danger of division and inability to tolerate differences / inequalities of moral standards, his life is not just merely be a risk that must be faced by those who hold different religious marriage only, but a risk and danger to be anticipated in any wise by all the partners who built the household, any religion. Management and policy is necessary for those who are diving interfaith marriages, but by no means be claimed once only, that as if they are married religious differences are much more prone to experiencing catastrophic when compared with those who are married co-religionists.Is a knife that has a risk factor could potentially injure your hands and be used as a tool of murder should be banned its existence? Not so is not it?!. Although the risk, but it does not mean that the existence of the knife should be altogether banned.Then so is the marriage of different religions. The existence of risk in a marriage two people of different religions, can not be taken for granted at the conclusion to negate / forbid interfaith marriage.That then it is necessary to provide Touchstone describing in detail the risk factors in a marriage of different religions, it is the duty of the Church in order to explain and assist in the process of special religious instruction.The second, related assumption triumphalistis, who claimed that families of different religions will not be able to answer the apostolic duty to be salt and light. I think the assumption is made exclusively through the lens, with an emphasis that only the color of the one who can bring in the mission. Different colors are not.So instead, is there any guarantee that the color / Christian family can completely bring in salt and light, and imposed a missionary Dei completely and totally?If a true salt and light associated with the daily behavior, manifested through speech, thought and action that surrounded you, then it would not be possible for families of different religions to bring harmony and peace through the story of their daily lives?I think the possibility is always open. And when put something good, beautiful, delicious to hear, which is based on love and truth are present and appear as the fruit of life of families of different religions, it is not true it is also an attempt enforcement of the will of God?In John 14:15 Jesus said Gusti, "If ye love me, keep my commandments." And in John 15:17 Jesus Gusti said that: "These commandments unto you: Love one another."So when families of different religions impose real love, would not they be called a family who keep the commandments of God and let the values of Christ as the head of their household and menutun?Which means indirectly also be called as a family headed by Christ himself is not it?!Technical difficultiesSome questions related to technical difficulties.
* How to form N1-N5 are made assuming the same religion?
* How did the ID cards required by the registrar must co-religionists?Given the marriage of different religions is a special case, then the N1-N5 form to be filled according to the procedure, and include the ID card as well as it is. Religion does not need to be engineered to be equated. When records are not willing to accept the filing of civil marriage and religious differences have been refused even though the arguments proffered by basing on the transitional provisions of Law No. 1/1974 article 66, which allows entry into force of HGR / HOCI, then it means Greja must have a special wisdom.Basis for specific policy is Law No. 1/74 of article 2, paragraph 1, which states that "lawful marriage of each religion."So then, congregation council has the authority to certify the marriage of different religions and create a Certificate of Approval Marriage Different Religion / SuTaPKaBA (that meet the rule "in accordance with the laws of each religion"). After that SuTaPKaBA given to the civil registry to be listed. However if the parties still refuse Civil, and not willing to accept, then the basis of the refusal letter, requested the District Court jurisprudence that issued the warrant listing.
* What if there is going to hold inter-religious marriage, but are not willing to be blessed in the church?Then, as told by Rev.. Sumardiyono-mechanism can be set through a special trial of the Church Assembly sole agenda is to approve the marriage of different religions. In it there is no blessing. Only prayer.
* What if there are willing to be blessed in church, but still ask for recognition and appreciation of differences in beliefs espoused?Why not. That is, the church can bring religious leaders in accordance with the religion professed by one of the bride. As enacted in GKJ Salatiga, the blessing of marriage can be performed by a priest and kiai, simultaneously at the same time, using a special liturgy.Behind all of this, everything technical is essentially just follow the things that are of principle. So when the church decided in principle to transform itself from a paradigm of faith exclusive / closed to the paradigm of faith that is inclusive / open, then that can be arranged with the technical base themselves on matters of principle. Finally, inter-religious marriage in a particular context, if it should happen ... why not. ***Reference material:- Marriage Law 1 of 1974.- Rev. Andri Purnawan, Different Religions Marriages, Could it be?, In a post on www.gkjwcaruban.org/ ....- Weinata Sairin, Pattiasina JM, ed., Implementation of the Marriage Law in Christian Perspective, set the study of marriage in the environment: the Communion of Churches in Indonesia, BPK-GM, 1994.-Procedures and Kristen Jawi Greja Pranata Wetan, General Assembly GKJW, 1996
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
